Shape Memory Alloys Research

course holding Alloys Research1.1 General considerationsWhen a fix metallic alloy is subjected to an external force greater than its ductile limit, it deforms plastically, i.e. the twisting persists after returning to the unloaded state. The make retentiveness Alloys (SMAs) do not fol subaltern this behaviour. At low temperatures, an SMA specimen may undergo a plastic deorganization of about few percent, and then fully notice its initial figure that had at high temperature by simple passion above a threshold temperature. Their ability to recover their form when the temperature is raised, makes this phratry of substantives unique. This phenomenon has been discovered in 1938 by researchers working on the gold-cadmium alloys Gilbertson (1994). The force reminiscence board answer remained a laboratory curiosity until 1963, when the first industrial and aesculapian applications appeared.1.2 Martensitic revolutionThe become storage center is based on the populace of a reversible pattern break of thermoelastic martensitic image Kurdjumov, Khandros (1949), Kumar, Lagoudas (2008), in the midst of a microstructural state at high temperature (austenite build) and a microstructural state at low temperature (martensite anatomy) Patoor et al. (2006), Lagoudas et al. (2006). Austenite has in general a cubic crystallizing lattice, art object martensite is of tetragonal, monoclinic, or orthorhombic crystal lattice. The transubstantiation from one crystal lattice to the some other(prenominal) make outs by distortion of the shear lattice does and not by atoms diffusion. This type of chemise is called martensitic variation Perkins (1975), Funakubo (1987), Otsuka, Wayman (1999). In reality, the matrenitic shimmy in SMAs is a anatomy renewing of the first order, where there is co-existence of several grades, and there is presence of interfaces in the midst of the manakins Gunin (1986).Historically, the circumstance martensitic work shift describes the work shift of the austenite of steels (iron-carbon alloys) to martensite during a quenching. By extension, this term has been generalized to a large issuing of alloys whose phase renewings have certain characteristics typical of the transformation of steels Rosa (2013).During martensitic transformation of a SMA, the crystal lattice of the real tilts its public figure. The microstructure of martensite is characterized by a flip in shape and by the difference in volume, which exists between matrensitic and austenitic phase Duerig et al. (1990). Therefore, interior(a) strains arise during the emergence of martensitic areas within the austenite. The internal strains flush toilet be partially relaxed by the formation of several areas of self-accommodated martensite crystals that understate the overall crookedness induced. These areas called variants and are oriented in different crystallographic directions Kumar (2008).In the absence of external strains, these va riants are equally possible and the distri besidesion of self-accommodated groups allows the clobber to be transform in order to retain its original shape. Therefore, the formation of the martensite results in elastic (reversible) torsions Funakubo (1987). At ageless temperature, the martensite-austenite interfaces are in unshakable state. A sort in temperature in one direction or the other results in moving these interfaces to the benefit of one or the other phase structure. The interfaces can also move under the action of an oblige strain. A specimen can therefore be distorted not by sliding, which is the usual mechanism of plastic deformation, but by the bearing and disappearance of martensite variants Kumar (2008).Therefore, during martensitic transformation atoms in the structure move on actually small distances steer to deformation of the crystal lattice. This causes a small variability in volume with shearing of the structure in a particular direction. During the t ransformation process, the growth of martensite crystals occur in form of platelets to minimize the cipher at the interface.The martensitic variants can occur in cardinal different types fit martensite (formed by combination of self-accommodated martensite variants) and detwinned martensite (reoriented martensite) where a particular variant dominates Liu, Xie (2007). The characteristic behavior of SMAs is based upon the reversible phase transformation from austenitic phase to martensitic phase and the opposite. By cooling under zip loading, the crystal sructure channelizes from austenitic to martensitic phase (forward transformation to twinned martensitic phase). This transformation is resulting in the phylogenesis of a number of martensitic variants, which are arranged in a way that the average change in macroscopic shape is insignificant, do a twinned martensite Leclercq, Lexcellent (1996). When the material is heated at the martensite phase, the crystal structure is transf orming to austenite (reverse transformation from detwinned martensitic to austenitic phase), cart tracking to recovery of shape Saburi, Nenno (1981), Shimizu, Otsuka, Perkins (1975). The above process is called Shape Memory take (SME) Schetky (1979), Wayman, Harrison (1989).The martensitic transformation is characterized by four temperatures (Figure 2) Gotthard, Lehnert (2001)MS Temperature below which the martensite appears (martensite start)MF Temperature below which the accurate attempt is transformed into martensite (martensite finish)AS Temperature above which the austenite appears (austenite start)AF Temperature above which the entire sample is transformed into austenite (austenite finish)The transformation begins at the cooling to the temperature MS. This transformation is established to the temperature MF. Between these two temperatures, there is coexistence of two phases, which is a characteristic of transformation of the first order. If the cooling is interrupted, th e material will not change. To go back off to the initial shape, the temperature is increases so that the inverse transformation begins at the temperature AS and finishes to temperature AF, which is higher than MS Massalski et al. (1990). If the trace on a diagram (Figure 1) the volume fragment of material processed as a function of temperature, there is a hysteresis loop, due to the presence of an irreversible energy corresponding to dissipation of robotlike energy transformed into heat Ortin, Planes, Delaey (2006), Wei,Yang (1988).Figure 1 Martensitic transformation temperatures Gotthard, Lehnert (2001)The thermoelastic reversibility of the crystal lattice is certain in the case of an order alloy Otsuka, Shimizu (1977). The correlational statistics between the manifestation of martensitic transformation and atomic order was shown experimentally in Fe-Pt SMAs Dunne, Wayman (1973). Nevertheless, in disordered alloys, such as Fe-Pd, Mn-Cu and In-TI, can occur thermoelastic trans formation too. The atomic order is, therefore, a sufficient restrict for manifestation of thermoelastic transformation, but not obligatory Otsuka, Shimizu (1977).1.3 Thermo automatonlike properties of SMAsSeveral prepares specific to the SMAs appear through with(predicate) the transformations of the crystal lattice as a function of temperature and of the field of formes utilise on the material Duerig, Melton, Stckel (2013).1.3.1 Pseudoelastic loadingIn general, by pseudoelasticity we describe both the materials superelastic behavior, as well as rubble-like behavior. Superelastic behavior is called the reversible phase transformation produced by thermo-mechanical loading. Rubber-like movement attends to the reversible martensitic re- preference. The stress-strain curve during this process resamples to the superelastic behavior, which is similar to rubbers nonlinear elastic behavior Otsuka, Wayman (1999).Therefore, a part from inducing phase transformation thermally, martensi tic transformation can also be prompt by applying on the material appropriately high mechanical loading, resulting in creating a martensitic phase from austenite. When the temperature of the SMA goes above AF, shape recovery is resulted while unloading. Such behavior of the material is termed pseudoelastic ready Kumar (2008). melodic line-induced martensite, is generally forming from austenite when external stress is present. The process of forming stress-induced martensite can occur through different thermomechanical loading routes Miyazaki, Otsuka (1986). One form of stress-induced martensite is the detwinned martensitic phase formed from austenitic after application of external stress. The material, during the stress-induced martensitic transformation and the reversed process, shows nonlinear elastic behavior described by closed - curves. This nonlinear elastic behavior is called pseudoelastic transformation Otsuka, K. and K. Shimizu (1981). The shape recovery is due to crystall ographic reversibility of transformation, like in the shape memory effect. Hence, the two phenomena, transformation pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect are practically the same except the fact that reverse transformation is produced by warming the specimen to temperature above AF. In reality, an alloy that undergoes thermoelastic martensitic transformation exhibits both transformation pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect Otsuka, K. and K. Shimizu (1981).Nevertheless, for occurring transformation pseudoelasticity, the requirement stress for slip should be greater than that for stress-induced martensite transformation. As an example, we can refer to equiatomic Ti-Ni alloys which are exposed to slip and do not exhibit some(prenominal) transformation pseudoelasticity, regardless of their Ni content. It was shown, however, that Ni-rich Ti-Ni alloys subjected to annealing after cold working, ca apply refining of their grain size, leads in raising critical slip stress, which res ults in any transformation pseudoelasticity Miyazaki et al. (1982), Saburi, Tatsumi, Nenno (1982), Saburi, Yoshida, Nenno (1984). The existence of transformation pseudoelasticity is affected by guileless orientation, composition of the alloy, and direction of applied stresses Miyazaki, Otsuka (1986).1.3.2 One-Way Shape Memory marrowAnother property of SMAs is the one-way shape memory effect. It takes place in four steps(1) The material is cooled to a temperature lower than MF (the invoke austenitic phase) to obtain self-accommodated martensite.(2) Re-orientation of variants of the martensite is obtained via application of stress.(3) The stress is released at constant temperature T F. The material remains to a shape depending on the stress field.(4) The sample is heated at a temperature T AF making re-appear the austenitic phase and the material gets its original shape, as shown in Figure 2.Figure 2 One-way shape memory effect Miyazaki, Otsuka (1986)Two conditions are necessary f or occurring shape recovery by shape memory effect. Firstly, the transformation should be reversible, and second, slip should not occur during the entire deformation process. Martensitic transformations in ordered alloys are reversible in nature Miyazaki, Otsuka (1986), Arbuzova, Khandros (1964), so the entire shape memory effect mainly occurs in this type of alloys. The second condition is necessary because in the case of high stress and every type of deformation mode (stress-induced martensitic transformation in parent phase, twinning in the martensitic phase) slip can be induced, resulting in plastic strain and, not completed recovery of shape.In the one-way shape memory effect, the shape in memory by the SMA is the one of the parent phase.1.3.3 Two-Way Shape Memory EffectThe nonpartisan shape memory effect is the reversible passage of a shape at a high temperature to another shape at low temperature under stress.The bipartite shape memory effect should precede the SMA training Nagasawa, et al. (1974. Training of SMAs consists of temperature cycling at constant stress or stress cycling at constant temperature. During training, microstructural defects (i.e. dislocations) lead to internal stresses and therefore promote oriented martensite. A SMA subjected to training can then move from austenitic phase to oriented martensite under zero load by simple change of temperature Schroeder, Wayman (1977). It has then a shape in memory for each of the two phases.Various methods that cause two-way shape memory effect have been suggested, such as, large deformation in stress-induced martensite transformation at temperatures MS Delaey et al. (1974), shape memory effect training Schroeder, Wayman (1977), stress-induced martensite training Schroeder, Wayman (1977), training involving both of shape memory effect as well as stress-induced martensite Perkins, Sponholz (1984) remaining in martensite state while heating at a temperature AF Takezawa, Shindo, Sato (1976), as well as using precipitates Tadaki, Otsuka, Shimizu (1988).1.4 sack Induced Plasticity ( send)Several experimental studies have shown the development of nonlinear plastic (irreversible) strain when phase transformations occur Greenwood, Johnson (1965), Abrassart (1972), Magee (1966), Desalos (1981), Olson, Cohen (1986), Denis et al. (1982). This mechanism of deformation is termed Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP), resulting from internal stress rising from the change in volume related to the transformation, as well as from the associated change in shape Marketz, Fischer (1994). TRIP differs from classical plasticity. Although plasticity is caused from the applied stress or variation in temperature, TRIP is triggered by phase variations, and occurs blush at low and constant stress levels Gautier et al. (1989), Leblond et al. (1989), Gautier (1998), Tanaka, Sato (1985), Fischer et al. (2000, 1996). TRIP takes place because of two separate mechanisms. The first, refers to a pro cess of accommodation of micro-plasticity related to volume change Greenwood, Johnson (1965). The other, refers to an orientation caused by shear internal stresses, favoring the direction of preferred orientation for the formation of martensite when and external stress is present, which involves change in shape Magee (1966). TRIP is caused by the difference in compactness of the lattice structure between the austenite (parent) and the martensite (product) phase Greenwood, Johnson (1965). During martensitic transformation, this difference has produces a change in volume as well as internal stresses causing plasticity in the phase with less yield stress, which is weaker Paiva, Savi, Pacheco (2005).REFERENCESAbrassart, F., Influence des Transformations Martensitiques sur les Proprits Mcaniques des Alliages du Systme Fe-Ni-Cr-C, Thse dtat, Universit de Nancy I (Trance), 1972.Arbuzova, I. and L. Khandros, irregular elongation and reduced resistance to plastic deformation due to martensi tic transformation in the alloy CU-AL-NI. Phys. Metals Metallogr., 17(3), pp. 68-74, 1964.Delaey, L., et al., Thermoelasticity, pseudoelasticity and the memory effects associated with martensitic transformations. journal of monotoneerials scientific discipline, 9(9), pp. 1521-1535, 1974.Denis, S., Simon, A. and Beck, G., Estimation of the Effect of Stress/ variety Transformation Interaction when Calculating Internal Stress during Martensitic Quenching of Steel, Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jap., Vol. 22, pp. 505, 1982.Desalos, Y., Comportement dilatomtrique et mcanique de lAustnite Mtastabledun Acier A 533, IRSID answer for n. 95.34.94.01 MET 44, 1981.Duerig, T., K. Melton, D. Stockel, C. Wayman (Eds.), Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys, Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 1990.Duerig, T.W., K. Melton, and D. Stckel, Engineering aspects of shape memory alloys, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013.Dunne, D. and C. Wayman, The effect of austenite ordering on the martensite transformation in Fe-Pt alloys near the composition Fe3Pt I. syllable structure and transformation characteristics. Metallurgical Transactions, 4(1), pp. 137-145, 1973.Fischer, F.D., Reisner, G., Werner, E., Tanaka, K., Cailletaud, G. and Antretter, T., A New View on Transformation Induced Plasticity, International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 16, pp. 723-748, 2000.Fischer, F.D., Sun, Q.P. and Tanaka, K., Transformation induced plasticity (TRIP), employ mechanics Review, Vol. 49, pp. 317-364, 1996.Funakubo, H. (Ed.), Shape Memory Alloys, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1987.Funakubo, H., Shape Memory Alloys, Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ, New York, p. 275, 1987.Gautier, E., Dformation de transformation et plasticit de transformation, cole dt MH2M, Mthodes dHomognisation en Mcanique des Matriaux, La Londe Les Maures (Var, France), 1998.Gautier, E., Zhang, X.M. and Simon, A., Role of Internal Stress State on Transformation Induced Plasticity and Transformation Mechanisms during the impart of Stre ss Induced strain Transformation, International Conference on Residual Stresses- ICRS2, (Ed G. Beck, S. Denis and A. Simon), Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 777-783, 1989.Gilbertson, R. G. , Muscle Wires see Book, Mondotronics, p. 2-1/2-8, 1994.Gotthard R. and T. Lehnert, Alliages mmoire de forme, Trait des matriaux n19 Matriaux mergents, p. 81-105, 2001.Greenwood, G.W. Johnson, R.H., The tortuosity of Metals under Small Stresses during Phase Transformation, transactions of the olympian Society A 283, pp. 403-422, 1965.Greenwood, G.W. and Johnson, R.H., The Deformation of Metals under Small Stresses during Phase Transformation, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 283, pp. 403-422, 1965.Gunin, G., Alliages mmoire de forme, Techniques de broomnieur, vol. 10, p. 1-11, 1986.Kumar P., Introduction to Shape Memory Alloys, Shape Memory Alloys, 2008Kumar, P. and D. Lagoudas, Shape Memory Alloys Modeling and Engineering Applications. 2008, Springer Science, New York, NY.Kurdju mov, G. V., L. G. Khandros, First reports of the thermoelastic behaviour of the martensitic phase of Au-Cd alloys, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 66 (1949) 211-213.Lagoudas, D. C., P. B. Entchev, P. Popov, et al., Shape memory alloys, Part II Modeling of polycrystals, Mechanics of Materials, vol. 38, p. 430-462, 2006.Leblond, J., Devaux, J. and Devaux, J.C., Mathematical Modeling of Transformation Plasticity in Steels I event of Ideal-plastic Phases, International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 5, pp. 551-572, 1989.Leblond, J., Mathematical Modeling of Transformation Plasticity in Steels II Coupling with Strain Hardening Phenomena, International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 5, pp. 573-591, 1989.Leclercq S., and C. Lexcellent, A general macroscopic description of the thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of solids, 44, 953-980, 1996.Liu Y., and Z. Xie, Detwinning in shape memory alloy, In Progress in Smart Materials and Structures, Ed. Peter L. Reece, pp. 29-65, 2007.Magee, C.L., Transformation Kinetics, Microplasticity and Aging of Martensite in Fe-31 Ni, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie plant of Technology, Pittsburg, PA, 1966.Marketz, F. and Fischer, F.D., A Micromechanical Study on the Coupling Effect Between Microplastic Deformation and Martensitic Transformation, Computational Materials Science, Vol. 3, pp. 307-325, 1994.Massalski, T.B., et al., Binary alloy phase diagrams. vol. 3. ASM International, pp. 1485, 1990.Miyazaki S, Ohmi Y, Otsuka K, Suzuki Y. Characteristics of deformation and transformation pseudoelasticity in Ti-Ni alloys. Le Journal de Physique Colloques, 43, 1982.Miyazaki, S. and K. Otsuka, Deformation and transition behavior associated with theR-phase in Ti-Ni alloys. Metallurgical Transactions A, 17(1), pp. 53-63, 1986.Nagasawa, A., et al., Reversible shape memory effect. Scripta Metallurgica, 8(9), pp. 1055-1060, 1974.Olson, G.B. and Cohen, M., Mechanical Properties and Phase Transformation in Engineerin g Materials, TMS-AIME, Warrendale, Pa (Ed S. D. Antolovich, R. O. Ritchie and W. W. Gerberich), pp.367, 1986.Ortin, J., A. Planes and L. Delaey , Hysteresis in Shape-Memory Materials in The Science of Hysteresis, (2006), pp. 467-553.Otsuka and K, Shimizu, K., Ser. Metall. 1, pp. 757-60, 1977.Otsuka, K. and K. Shimizu, Pseudoelasticity, In Metals Forum, 1981.Otsuka, K., C. M.Wayman (Eds.), Shape Memory Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.Paiva, A., M.A. Savi, P.M. Pacheco, Modeling transformation induced plasticity in shape memory alloys, Proceedings of COBEM, 18th International relation back of Mechanical Engineering, Nov. 6-11, 2005, Ouro Preto, MG, 2005.Patoor, E., D. C. Lagoudas, P. B. Entchev, et al., Shape memory alloys, Part I General properties and border of single crystals, Mechanics of Materials, vol. 38, p. 391-429, 2006.Perkins, J. and R. Sponholz, Stress-induced martensitic transformation cycling and two-way shape memory training in Cu-Zn-Al alloys. Metallurgical transactions A, 15(2), pp. 313-321, 1984.Perkins, J., Shape Memory make in Alloys, Plenum Press, New York, 1975.Rosa M., Phase Transformations in Steels, Volume 1 Fundamentals and Diffusion-Controlled Transformations, International Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 70(2), pp. 337-338, 2013.Saburi, T. and S. Nenno, The shape memory effect and related phenomena. Solid to Solid Phase Transformations, pp. 1455-1479, 1981.Saburi, T., M. Yoshida, and S. Nenno, Deformation behavior of shape memory TiNi alloy crystals. Scripta metallurgica, 18(4), pp. 363-366, 1984.Saburi, T., T. Tatsumi, and S. Nenno, Effects of heat treatment on mechanical behavior of Ti-Ni alloys. Le Journal de Physique Colloques, 43(C4), pp. C4-261-C4-266, 1982.Schetky, L., Shape-memory alloys, Scientific American 241 (74-82), 1979.Schroeder, T. and C. Wayman, The two-way shape memory effect and other training phenomena in Cu Zn single crystals. Scripta Metallurgica, 11(3), pp. 225-230, 1977.Shimizu, K., K. Otsuka, and J. Perkins, Shape Memory Effects in Alloys. Perkins, J., Ed.(New York Plenum), pp. 60-87, 1975.Tadaki, T., K. Otsuka, and K. Shimizu, Shape memory alloys. Annual Review of Materials Science, 18(1), pp. 25-45, 1988.Takezawa, K., T. Shindo, and S.I. Sato, Shape memory effect in 1-CuZnAl alloys. Scripta Metallurgica, 10(1), pp. 13-18, 1976.Tanaka, K. and Sato, Y., A Mechanical View of Transformation-Induced Plasticity, Ingenieur Archiv 55, pp. 147-155, 1985.Wayman, M., J. Harrison, The origins of the shape memory effect, Journal of Minerals, Metals, and Materials 41 (99) pp. 26-28, 1989.Wei, Z., D. Yang, On the hysteresis loops and characteristic temperatures of thermoelastic martensitic transformations, Scripta Metallurgica, Volume 22, Issue 8, 1988, pp. 1245-1249.