Ontology :: essays research papers

Ontology&9 adept of the most controversial debates in philosophy has been over the nature of being. In the Pre-Socratic era the dispute focused on whether change was constant plot of land our human perceptions made static separations so that we could make sense of our environment, or if being pull rounds omnipresently and that our perceptions of diversity in matter are false. Plato tries to solve this plight with his theory of an objective populace in a realm various from that which we experience. Aristotle agrees with Socrates except that he believes an objects true essence cannot exist separated from the object itself. I presume that we can exist with our own identity and inhere to a greater whole simultaneously, however my freethinking does not extend beyond people. Nonetheless, these philosophers all had valid conclusions and their theories compliment all(prenominal) other.&9"War is king"1 said Heraclitus. He believes that reality is not composed of a number of th ings, but is a motion of continual creation and destruction. An accurate metaphor for his rationale is a river. Its location remains basically the same. One can walk away(p) from it, and return with the confidence that it will still be thither. However, the exact pissing that flows through it is never the same. One cant tell the passing between the water in the river now and the water in the river previous and yet this transience of matter does not detract from the identity of the river. Heraclitus would plead that all of what we experience is like the river, forever changing in a process of erosion and creation.&9Heraclitus successor, Parmenides, believes that Being must exist about in the judging. Because nothing cannot be thought without thinking of it as something, in that respect cannot be "nothing"2, all that can exist is Being. If there is all Being it must be indestructible, uncreated, and eternal. If one agrees that Being is , then there cant be any place where being is not. tally Parmenides purely logical view, all perception of vacuous space is an illusion.&9Plato tried to solve this dilemma of ontology with his theory of the forms. "You have before your mind these two orders of things, the visible and the intelligible,"3 he says, which can be compared to notion and knowledge respectively. In The Republic he uses a field simile to explain the connection between what we perceive and what really exists. Dividing a literary argument in four unequal parts gives us the four stages of agreement with a state of being on one slope of the line corresponding to a state of understanding on the other side of the line.